Subscribe
Logo
Logo
  • Topics Icon Topics
    • AI Icon AI
    • Banking Icon Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi Icon Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance Icon Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity Icon Fraud/Identity
    • Investing Icon Investing
    • Lending Icon Lending
    • Payments Icon Payments
    • Regulation Icon Regulation
    • Startups Icon Startups
  • Podcasts Icon Podcasts
  • Products Icon Products
    • Webinars Icon Webinars
    • White Papers Icon White Papers
  • TechWire Icon TechWire
  • Search
  • Subscribe
Reading
Another Look at P2P Lending Default Rates
ShareTweet
Home
News Roundup
Another Look at P2P Lending Default Rates

Another Look at P2P Lending Default Rates

Peter Renton·
News Roundup
·Oct. 12, 2011·2 min read

It has been nine months since we took a close look at p2p lending default rates. Defaults have such an impact on returns for investors that I thought it was time to revisit this topic.

Back in January when we looked at the basket of loans that were originated from July 2009 through June 2010 at Lending Club and Prosper these loans were only 11 months old. Now they are close to 20 months old and past the peak default period. There will still be some more defaults but the impact of future defaults will have far less impact than these early defaults. This is because investors will have received more than half of their investment back on almost all the loans that are current now.

Where do we stand today? As expected defaults have risen dramatically in the last nine months and also as expected Lending Club has a lower default rate (6.83%) than Prosper (8.55%). These default numbers have more than doubled since looking at these loans back in January – back then Lending Club was at 2.75% and Prosper 3.99%. Overall, though, these loans are producing decent (albeit single digit) investment returns according to Lendstats.

Below is the updated table for loans issued from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. All the numbers are current as of today and will certainly change in the future. [table id=19 /]

We should also keep in mind that Prosper and Lending Club have changed their underwriting algorithms since they issued the loans in that period so today many of these loans would not make it on to the platform, or they would have a different interest rate. So, most likely defaults would be lower and ROI higher if investing in a similar bucket of loans today.

What was interesting to me is that late loans at both companies is running at about the same percentage. But it is safe to assume that defaults at Prosper will remain significantly higher than Lending Club which is understandable given the higher risk borrowers and higher interest rates being charged there. But according to Lendstats Prosper investors are being rewarded for taking on these higher interest loans with an estimated ROI of 9.01%.

Finally, Michael at Nickel Steamroller has been producing some great work recently and he has a bunch of new charts on his site now. I pulled the default rate chart for the same period analyzed here. The red line is Prosper and the blue line is Lending Club.

Default rate analysis for Lending Club and Prosper

  • Peter Renton
    Peter Renton

    Peter Renton cofounded Fintech Nexus as the world’s largest digital media company focused on fintech before it was acquired by Command. Peter has been writing about fintech since 2010 and he is the author and creator of the Fintech One-on-One Podcast, the first and longest-running fintech interview series.

    View all posts
Tags
default rateLending ClubProsper
Related

LendingClub exceeds expectations in strong Q1 earnings

LendingClub delivers better than expected earnings in Q4 2023

New SBA Lending Rules Are Only a Start

lending club q42022 presentation

LendingClub outlines cautious approach to support long-term growth

Popular Posts

Today:

  • FUTURE NEXUS IMAGE TEMPLATES!! (2)OCC Hints at Trouble for Charters Jun. 18, 2026
  • 2026 US Employees Added (1)Banking on Trust in a Tightening Economy Jul. 2, 2026

This month:

  • FUTURE NEXUS IMAGE TEMPLATES!! (2)OCC Hints at Trouble for Charters Jun. 18, 2026
  • Dr. Devi Parikh“Too heavy of a hammer”: How Yutori is beating AI giants at building the web’s future Sep. 10, 2026
  • Santiago SuarezInside Addi’s mission to build a fairer financial system in Colombia Feb. 19, 2026
  • Ryan WigginsMercury’s Ryan Wiggins on Building Customer Trust: Lessons from a Decade at Facebook and WhatsApp Jul. 2, 2026
  • Dr. Jean NehmeHardware as a durable moat & the former surgeon’s bet on “soft robotic cells” Aug. 27, 2026
  • Ram PalaniappanIn 2026, Your Wages Should Not Be On a Two-Week Delay Aug. 20, 2026
  • TitoEscaping the demo: The founders building the foundation for medtech physical AI Jul. 23, 2026
  • Ethan ChanAllium CEO Ethan Chan on making blockchain data usable Sep. 3, 2026
  • 197Renton’s Take on Loan Model Risks Nov. 4, 2025
  • Funded – 6/26/26Funded: Attention raises $30M as AI sales software shifts from note-taking to action Jun. 26, 2026

More News
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
Subscribe
Copyright © 2026 Fintech Nexus
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Banking
    • Blockchain/DeFi
    • Embedded Finance
    • Fraud/Identity
    • Investing
    • Lending
    • Payments
    • Regulation
    • Startups
  • Podcasts
  • Products
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • TechWire
  • Contact Us
Start typing to see results or hit ESC to close
lis digital banking USA Lending Club UK
See all results